Riyadh ChamberMunjaz11My actionsNotifications

Priority & weighting model

Version ⁦4⁩ · Approved

The priority criteria and weights, and the project weighting model.

Total weight

100 / 100

Total is 100 — ready to save

Value · 40%Urgency & compliance · 20%Impact · 22%Effort & risk · 18%

Criteria and weights

The eleven criteria. Weights are percentages of the score; criteria that lower priority count inverted.

Value

  • Fit with the chamber’s strategyRaises priority

    How far the proposal moves the objectives, initiatives and KPIs of the Riyadh Chamber 2025–2030 strategy, “A trusted partner for the business community”.

    %
  • Value added to the business communityRaises priority

    The value it adds to the business community and the chamber: a stronger voice for businesses, better service or a new capability.

    %
  • Financial return & sustainabilityRaises priority

    The return in the feasibility study, and its contribution to the chamber’s financial sustainability from non-membership revenue: services, programmes, events and investment.

    %

Urgency & compliance

  • UrgencyRaises priority

    The cost of delay: what the chamber and its member businesses lose if work does not start this year.

    %
  • Regulatory requirementRaises priority

    Is it required by the Chambers of Commerce Law, a regulation, a board decision or a supervising body’s directive (Ministry of Commerce, NCA, the National Data Management Office)?

    %

Impact

  • Impact on members & beneficiariesRaises priority

    Its direct effect on member businesses, entrepreneurs and job seekers: time, effort and satisfaction.

    %
  • Sustainability impactRaises priority

    Its contribution to energy and water efficiency in the chamber’s buildings and branches, and lower emissions.

    %
  • Digital transformation impactRaises priority

    Its contribution to digital member services, chamber processes and the use of business-sector data.

    %

Effort & risk

  • RiskLowers priority

    Delivery, technical and contractual risk — the higher it is, the lower the priority.

    %
  • ComplexityLowers priority

    The number of parties, branches, systems, integrations and procedure changes involved.

    %
  • Resource requirementLowers priority

    The team, budget and scarce skills it draws from the portfolio’s capacity.

    %
Esc

Quick actions

Go to

Projects

↑↓to move↵to openEscto close