What if? — Building Rehabilitation & Sustainability Portfolio
The portfolio’s digital twin: try a budget cut, a change in people, cancelled projects and new project proposals, and read each decision’s impact before you take it.
Savings needed
SAR 0
Savings the engine found SAR 0
Expected value after the decision
SAR 55MSAR 55M
keeps 100.0%
Weighted risk
7272
High-risk: 1 → 1
People
6767FTE
Need 67 of 67 available
Move a control to see what the engine suggests.
The engine’s recommendation per project
Lowest merit first. Click a card to read the full reasoning.
Keep
Continues as plannedThe portfolio’s digital twin
Bubble colour is the engine’s recommendation; size is the project’s remaining cost.
- Keep
- Reduce scope
- Merge
- Defer
- Stop
| Category | Risk score | Strategic value | Cost remaining | Chart legend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Converting the Current Headquarters into a Member Services Centre & Committee Rooms | 93.0 | 84.0 | SAR 7.8M | Keep |
| Solar Power for the Chamber’s Buildings & Branches | 28.0 | 81.0 | SAR 2M | Keep |
| Energy Retrofit of the Chamber’s Existing Buildings (ESCO) | 62.0 | 61.0 | SAR 1.5M | Keep |
| Shaqra Branch Rehabilitation | 26.0 | 74.0 | SAR 1.3M | Keep |
| Business Centre (Exit 6) Branch Rehabilitation | 19.0 | 71.0 | SAR 100K | Keep |
From remaining spend to spend after the decision
- Total
- Increase
- Decrease
| Category | Change | Running total |
|---|---|---|
| Remaining spend today | SAR 13.9M | SAR 13.9M |
| After the decision | SAR 13.9M | SAR 13.9M |
Saved scenarios, compared
Pick up to three scenarios to compare side by side on budget, benefits, risks and resources.
A — 15% budget cut
Ready-made
B — 10% cut with 10% fewer people
Ready-made
Current scenario (not saved)
Scenario comparison
| AA — 15% budget cut | BB — 10% cut with 10% fewer people | |
|---|---|---|
| Budget cut | 15% | 10% |
| People change | 0% | −10% |
| Cancelled projects | — | — |
| Added proposals | — | — |
| Savings found | 4.8M | 4.4M |
| Shortfall | 282K | Target met |
| Value after the decision | 46.9M85.3% | 47.4M86.2% |
| Risk after the decision | 70 | 69 |
| People needed | 48 / 67 | 50 / 60 |
| Recommendations | Keep 2Reduce scope 2Stop 1 | Keep 3Reduce scope 1Stop 1 |
Value kept vs savings
- Value kept %
- Savings of budget %