RSK-0028Training & Employment Centre Complex
Possible removal of the MEP subcontractor
A risk's detail, response, contingency and residual risk.
Risk statement
From cause to event to impact — with the preventive controls before the event and the contingency after it
Cause
Ambiguous contract clauses and vendor scope
Preventive controls
- Legal review of the disputed clauses
- A signed agreement note for every change
2 / 2
Event
Possible removal of the MEP subcontractor
The vendor refuses a written instruction
Contingency
Use the contract’s dispute mechanism
Impact
Disputes, claims and delayed approvals
Assessment
The level before and after the response
Inherent
Residual
Exposure
SAR 475K
Residual
73% off the score
Score trend
Last six months
- Score
- Target residual
Escalation path
Escalation engine: a high risk unreviewed for 10 days notifies the PM, 15 the programme manager, 20 the PMO director
Last reviewed 10 days ago
Project manager
Current levelEng. Shahad M. Al-Malki
Currently followed up here- 2
Programme manager
Eng. Shahad M. Al-Malki
Automatically at 15 days unreviewed · in 5 days - 3
PMO director
Dr. Noura M. Al-Otaibi
Automatically at 20 days unreviewed · in 10 days - 4
Executive committee
Dr. Abdullah S. Al-Qahtani
By the PMO director’s decision
Mitigation plan
Each action with its owner and date — tick it off when complete
Legal review of the disputed clauses
Eng. Abdulrahman S. Al-HarbiEng. Abdulrahman S. Al-HarbiDirector General, Training & EntrepreneurshipP-014ab.alharbi@chamber.saIn progressIn 28 days2026-11-2515 Jumada II 1448 AHA signed agreement note for every change
Eng. Shahad M. Al-MalkiEng. Shahad M. Al-MalkiSenior Project Manager — Buildings & FacilitiesP-022s.almalki@chamber.saNot startedIn 28 days2026-11-2515 Jumada II 1448 AH
Trigger
The vendor refuses a written instruction
Contingency
Use the contract’s dispute mechanism